Pelagic Ecosystems

Killer whales

Killer whales have genetically and behaviorally different groups, called ecotypes. Both resident ecotype (AB pod) and transient ecotype (AT1 population, shown in this photo) killer whales died following the Exxon Valdez oil spill in 1989. AB pod is recovering after 30 years but has still not reached pre-spill numbers. The AT1 population is not recovering and may be headed toward extinction.

Who We Are

Craig Matkin, North Gulf Oceanic Society

Craig Matkin, North Gulf Oceanic Society

Dan Olsen, North Gulf Oceanic Society

Dan Olsen, North Gulf Oceanic Society

John Durban, Oregon State University

John Durban, Oregon State University

Dorsal fin a pirate’s black sail
Here, and gone; here, and gone; here, and gone
Following seas eternally

Why are we sampling?

We are monitoring population recovery in both the resident killer whale ecotype (the AB pod) and the transient ecotype (the AT1 population), both of which suffered a significant number of deaths following the Exxon Valdez oil spill in 1989. These two killer whale ecotypes are separated based largely on genetics and diet preference—resident killer whales primarily eat fish while transient killer whales prefer marine mammals—and, despite the transient moniker, both groups are found regularly within the Prince William Sound and Kenai Fjords study area year round.

As an apex predator, killer whales play a key role in the ecosystem through predation on fish and marine mammals. They are also a primary wildlife species of interest for viewing by  the region’s vibrant tour boat industry. The tour boats provide not only a broad audience for the dissemination of our findings, but an opportunity to stress the importance of viewing guidelines and considerate behavior around the whales.

Where are we sampling?

This project is part of ongoing killer whale research in Prince William Sound and the Kenai Fjords region, Alaska. The overall study area stretches from the Nuka Bay, outer Kenai Peninsula region to Cordova on the eastern edge of Prince William Sound.

How are we sampling?

The core objective of this project is the monitoring of population parameters based on photo identification. Additionally, we annually sample prey and fecal material to investigate feeding habits and map trophic changes. We have placed remote acoustic stations in ocean entrances frequently used by the whales to explore  temporal and geographic patterns of use for both resident and transient killer whales. This is particularly valuable in winter when vessel work is not possible. 

The types of analysis that result include population dynamics and modeling at appropriate intervals, genetic sequencing as necessary for determination of population affiliation, and acoustic analysis of remote hydrophone data. Genetic analysis of scats and of predation samples is conducted under cooperative arrangement at the Northwest Fisheries Science Center, Seattle and Pacific Biological Station, Nanaimo, BC, Canada. Although work is focused on the southern Alaska resident and AT1 transient populations which were both impacted by the Exxon Valdez oil spill, the study also includes the other two recognized populations in the region, the Gulf of Alaska transients and the Offshore killer whales. The project contributes annually to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service killer whale stock assessments. It also provides comparative data that is used in continuing studies of the endangered Southern Residents of Washington State.  We actively collaborate with scientists at the NOAA Northwest Fisheries Science Center that direct research on the Southern Residents.

RESEARCH COLLABORATORS DR. JOHN FORD (RIGHT) AND GRAEME ELLIS PREPARE TO DEPLOY A SOUNDTRAP HYDROPHONE IN PROTECTIVE CASING. THE DEVICE WILL BE RETRIEVED IN 6-8 MONTHS AND THE RECORDINGS DOWNLOADED AND ANALYZED. RECORDINGS FROM THESE REMOTE STATIONS WILL PROVIDE YEAR-ROUND KILLER WHALE MOVEMENT INFORMATION AND IDENTIFY USE BY POPULATION AND POD. IT WILL PROVIDE DATA THAT CAN ALSO BE USED TO ESTIMATE WHALE NUMBERS.

What are we finding?

The fish-eating AB pod has made substantial steps toward recovery after 30 years but surprisingly has still not reached pre-spill numbers and in recent years there is indication that its growth may have paused. The marine mammal-eating AT1 population is not recovering and may be headed toward extinction, although its numbers have remained at 7 individuals for over a decade. This project has determined that killer whales are sensitive to perturbations such as oil spills but has not yet determined the long-term consequence (which may include extinction) or the recovery period required. As an apex predator, this species (both fish and mammal eating types) has an important role in the ecosystem. Additionally, they are a primary focus of viewing by an expanding tour boat industry in the region. Catalogs of individuals provided by this project are used by tour boats to enhance viewer experience along with direct interaction with the research vessel in the field. The draw of the whales and the interest in the research program fosters understanding and appreciation of the local environment and fauna by both visitors and residents.

Unlike many cetaceans, killer whale populations  can be closely monitored, down to the individual in some cases, which allows development of a detailed and comprehensive population dynamics model for the fish eating residents. (Matkin et al. 2014).

The remaining members of the very localized AT1 (Chugach)  transient population are annually monitored and each individual observed and cataloged. The wide-ranging Gulf of Alaska transients , also mammal eaters, are photographed when possible to determine trends in numbers. Also, all photographic identification data for the offshore form of killer whale are contributed to a coast-wide database at the Pacific Biological Station (Nanaimo, BC, Canada).  

This project is a unique opportunity to continue a comprehensive monitoring program for a keystone marine species with three ecotypes and multiple populations. This project was initiated in the early 1980s which provides an exceptional data lens for evaluating trends in population and monitoring other changes. Our close collaboration with similar long term projects in Puget Sound and British Columbia links our work closely with research on the endangered Southern residents of Puget Sound and Washington State. 

NUMBER OF WHALES IN AB POD AND AT1 POPULATION BY YEAR. NOTE: PAST THREE YEARS TOTAL FOR AB POD (CIRCLED) DOES NOT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THREE MISSING MATRILINES (AB17, AB22, AND AB14).

We have observed an increasing tendency toward temporary (and in some cases permanent) splitting of pods. This may signify more challenging feeding opportunities (e.g., fewer numbers of fish/smaller school size) that favor hunting in smaller groups. A similar trend has been observed in British Columbia. In recent decades, the southern Alaska resident killer whale population (except for AB pod) has grown steadily. This trend may be changing. In 2018, of the 148 killer whales in 18 matrilines in our core pods that were photographed, only two calves were recruited and there were three apparent new mortalities. In 2017, for the 155 whales from our core groups that were photographed, there were four calves recruited and 8 mortalities (confirmed in 2018). A trend of zero or negative growth may be developing in the southern Alaska killer whale population. Growth in the British Columbia northern resident population has halted in recent years and a similar situation may be developing in southern Alaska. There has been a rebound in salmon stocks in the past 40 years that we suspect has fueled increases in numbers in most resident pods in recent decades but this response may have ended and recent declines in north Pacific Chinook salmon may be having an impact.